[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50FEDF57.1060204@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:59 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"santosh.shilimkar@...com" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 2/2] ARM: tegra: Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if not Cortex
A9
On 01/22/2013 11:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:35:55PM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/21/2013 10:52 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>>> Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if CPU is not Cortex A9 with SCU.
>>
>> Will, is your for-next/perf branch stable; can I pull it into a branch
>> destined for arm-soc? Background below:
>
> I'm going to send a pull request to Russell tomorrow using my for-rmk/perf
> branch, so *that* is stable. You might, however, want to wait for Russell to
> push that out because it's also needed for kvm and, as such, will need to
> be published anyway.
>
> Sound ok?
I'm assuming rmk's branch will be a stable base, so that sounds great,
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists