[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358890299.6252.166.camel@cumari.coelho.fi>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:31:39 +0200
From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
<balbi@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drivers/misc/ti-st: remove gpio handling"
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 12:14 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com> [130121 03:16]:
> > This reverts commit eccf2979b2c034b516e01b8a104c3739f7ef07d1.
> >
> > The reason is that it broke TI WiLink shared transport on Panda.
> > Also, callback functions should not be added to board files anymore,
> > so revert to implementing the power functions in the driver itself.
> >
> > Additionally, changed a variable name ('status' to 'err') so that this
> > revert compiles properly.
> >
> > Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> [3.7]
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
>
> This also makes sense from converting to DT based boot as the GPIO
> calls should happen in the driver. Those mdelays probably can be fixed,
> but since this is a revert to a known working version:
I thought about checking exactly what we need as delays and whether we
really need to do all that toggling. At least in some boards, the
toggles are not needed, but I don't know for sure whether it works in
all different variations of the chip, so I kept them to be safe. Also,
I tried to deviate as little as possible from a plain revert, since I'd
like to get this into stable as well.
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Thanks!
--
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists