linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] async: fix __lowest_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwxQVf6+dGWvG3bOMaCp8RFFYvu9VP1uP=UXz+XfOriXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:22:11 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] async: fix __lowest_in_progress()

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Linus, I've updated the description to better explain why it's broken.
> The code is ugly but cleanup patches are already ready, so it will be
> cleaned up during 3.9-rc1.  How should this be routed?

I'm not a huge fan of the patch and I might even have preferred the
whole cleanup, but I took it as-is.

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/