[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130123.112745.1104072242042163713.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:27:45 +0100
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "santosh.shilimkar@...com" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 2/2] ARM: tegra: Skip scu_enable(scu_base) if not Cortex A9
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com> wrote @ Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:04:57 +0200 (EET):
> Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote @ Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:57:39 +0100:
>
> > Hiroshi, is this series the only dependency you need for your
> > Tegra114
>
> Basically yes.
>
> > series? So, I could merge your Tegra114 series once this series is applied?
>
> But now "CCF" seems to be in. Then, the HACK(*1) needs to be replaced
> with "Tegra114 CCF". But "Tegra114 CCF" doesn't seem ready yet. I'll check
> if this Tegra114 series would work without "Tegra114 CCF".
>
> *1: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/212010/
Stephen,
Verified "Tegra114 series" worked with "for-3.9/soc" branch(inc CCF)
with a little tweak.
I can post Tegra114 series again. If you want them rebased onto
another branch, let me know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists