[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130122163526.6c4ea765.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:35:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cgroup: initialize cgrp->dentry before css_alloc()
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:27:54 -0800
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> (cc'ing Andrew as scheduler folks are difficult to get response from
> these days and I can't think of anyone else to bother :)
>
> Hello, Li.
>
> The cgroup part looks good to me but it would be great if the
> descriptions are more detailed, especially, about why the change is
> beneficial or what it's aiming at. I take it that the shed changes
> are necessary to facilitate the later cgroup changes? Can you please
> elaborate how?
>
> The scheduler part of changes are mostly mechanical, so it would be
> great if we can get ack from scheduler people and route these together.
>
The sched parts do look pretty innocuous and could be viewed as "cgroup
stuff which happens to reside in kernel/sched/".
If you like the code, I think the best you can do is to merge it up,
make sure the sched guys are fully cc'ed then send it in to Linus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists