[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130123121635.f9d10701019ad76297799d68@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:16:35 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
Hi John,
Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c between commit f590dcec9445
("iwlwifi: fix the reclaimed packet tracking upon flush queue") from
Linus' tree and commit 1c3fea82d6eb ("iwlwifi: improve the reports in TX
path") from the wireless-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
index 31534f7,b0aad71..0000000
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
@@@ -1218,14 -1205,8 +1210,15 @@@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv
freed++;
}
+ if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS) {
+ priv->tid_data[sta_id][tid].next_reclaimed =
+ next_reclaimed;
+ IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
+ next_reclaimed);
+ }
+
- WARN_ON(!is_agg && freed != 1);
+ if (!is_agg && freed != 1)
+ IWL_ERR(priv, "Q: %d, freed %d\n", txq_id, freed);
/*
* An offchannel frame can be send only on the AUX queue, where
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists