[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130123014959.GB2723@blaptop>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:49:59 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, 695182@...s.debian.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Subtract min_free_kbytes from dirtyable memory
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:15:49PM +1100, paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au wrote:
> When calculating amount of dirtyable memory, min_free_kbytes should be
> subtracted because it is not intended for dirty pages.
So what's the effect for user?
It would be better to include that in description if possible.
>
> Using an "extern int" because that is the only interface to some such
> sysctl values.
>
> (This patch does not solve the PAE OOM issue.)
>
> Paul Szabo psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
> School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
>
> Reported-by: Paul Szabo <psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au>
> Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/695182
> Signed-off-by: Paul Szabo <psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au>
>
> --- mm/page-writeback.c.old 2012-12-06 22:20:40.000000000 +1100
> +++ mm/page-writeback.c 2013-01-21 13:57:05.000000000 +1100
> @@ -343,12 +343,16 @@
> unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory(void)
> {
> unsigned long x;
> + extern int min_free_kbytes;
>
> x = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) + global_reclaimable_pages();
>
> if (!vm_highmem_is_dirtyable)
> x -= highmem_dirtyable_memory(x);
>
> + /* Subtract min_free_kbytes */
> + x -= min(x, min_free_kbytes >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
It seems you saw old kernel.
Current kernel includes following logic.
static unsigned long global_dirtyable_memory(void)
{
unsigned long x;
x = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) + global_reclaimable_pages();
x -= min(x, dirty_balance_reserve);
if (!vm_highmem_is_dirtyable)
x -= highmem_dirtyable_memory(x);
return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
}
And dirty_lanace_reserve already includes high_wmark_pages.
Look at calculate_totalreserve_pages.
So I think we don't need this patch.
Thanks.
> +
> return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists