[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510039C8.7040401@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:28:08 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@...iomantic.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog
On 01/23/2013 02:47 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I'm definitely dropping SYNs and sending cookies,
> around 50/s. Is there any way to tell how many connections are queued in
> a particular socket?
I am not familiar with one. Doesn't mean there isn't one, only that I
am not able to think of it.
> Then if syncookies are enabled, the time spent in connect() shouldn't be
> bigger than 3 seconds even if SYNs are being "dropped" by listen, right?
Do you mean if "ESTABLISHED" connections are dropped because the listen
queue is full? I don't think I would put that as "SYNs being dropped by
listen" - too easy to confuse that with an actual dropping of a SYN segment.
But yes, I would not expect a connect() call to remain incomplete for
any longer than it took to receive an SYN|ACK from the other end. That
would be 3 (,9, 21, etc...) seconds on a kernel with 3 seconds as the
initial retransmission timeout.
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists