[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358971252.21576.121.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:00:52 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][3.8] x86: Don't clobber top of pt_regs in
nested NMI
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 08:58 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.11.12 at 20:19, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > @@ -1842,8 +1851,12 @@ nmi_swapgs:
> > SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
> > nmi_restore:
> > RESTORE_ALL 8
> > +
> > + /* Pop the extra iret frame */
> > + addq $(5*8), %rsp
>
> This could (for code efficiency) and should (for CFI annotation
> correctness) be folded into the RESTORE_ALL above (by
> converting "8" to "6*8").
Hi Jan,
This change never made it in. Would you like to send a patch, or would
you want me to do it?
-- Steve
>
> Jan
>
> > +
> > /* Clear the NMI executing stack variable */
> > - movq $0, 10*8(%rsp)
> > + movq $0, 5*8(%rsp)
> > jmp irq_return
> > CFI_ENDPROC
> > END(nmi)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists