linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:40:53 -0800
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Afzal Mohammed <afzal@...com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: divider: prepare for minimum divider

Quoting Afzal Mohammed (2013-01-23 03:38:52)
> Some of clocks can have a limit on minimum divider value that can be
> programmed, prepare for such a support.
> 
> Add a new field min_div for the basic divider clock and a new dynamic
> clock divider registration function where minimum divider value can
> be specified. Keep behaviour of existing divider clock registration
> functions, static initialization helpers as was earlier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@...com>

Hi Afzal,

I'd like to understand this a bit better.  At first the need for a
minimum divider makes a lot of sense, but I want to make sure it gets
designed correctly.

My first question is whether the minimum divider you plan to use is an
actual constraint of the hardware (e.g. the clock controller ip only
lets program two bits which divide by 4, 5, 6 or 7, where 4 is the
minimum divider) or if this is a functional constraint (e.g. the clock
hardware can divide by a lower value, but you never want that since it
results in non-functional video/audio/whatever).  If this is more of a
functional constraint then perhaps a new api like clk_set_min_rate makes
more sense.

Secondly, have you looked into using the rate-table option provided by
the basic divider clock?  Can you explain how this is not a good fit for
your needs?  Perhaps there are too many divisor values so the table
would be large?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/