[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130123155147.25fe49a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:51:47 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [tracepoint] cargo-culting considered harmful...
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:55:24 +0000
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> In samples/tracepoints/tracepoint-probe-sample.c:
> /*
> * Here the caller only guarantees locking for struct file and struct inode.
> * Locking must therefore be done in the probe to use the dentry.
> */
> static void probe_subsys_event(void *ignore,
> struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> path_get(&file->f_path);
> dget(file->f_path.dentry);
> printk(KERN_INFO "Event is encountered with filename %s\n",
> file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name);
> dput(file->f_path.dentry);
> path_put(&file->f_path);
> }
>
> note that
> * file->f_path is already pinned down by open(), path_get() does not
> provide anything extra.
> * file->f_path.dentry is already pinned by open() *and* path_get()
> just above that dget().
> * ->d_name.name *IS* *NOT* *PROTECTED* by pinning dentry down,
> whether it's done once or thrice.
I guess the first two are obvious (or at least, expected). But the
third isn't.
Where should a kernel developer go to learn these things?
include/linux/dcache.h doesn't mention d_name locking rules, nor does
Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists