[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5100C325.6020102@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:44:13 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] DMA Engine support for AM33XX
Matt,
On 1/24/2013 3:07 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>>
>>>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
>>>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only
>>>> a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP
>>>> DMA) found on the DaVinci family of SoCs.
>>
>>> Will you take this series through the OMAP tree? Only 1/14 touches
>>> mach-davinci and I am mostly okay with it except some changes I just
>>> requested Matt to make in another thread.
>>
>> Is this series somewhere near actually getting merged then? It seemed
>> like there was lots of stuff going on.
>
> The issues raised by Sekhar and Santosh were reasonably minor and will
> be addressed. My major concern is that the dependency on some api to
> fetch dmaengine driver SG limitations is not resolved. That's being
> discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/10/432
It might be worth posting the patches which don't have dependencies and
are ready for acceptance as a separate series. That way at least some of
these patches have a good chance of getting into v3.9 if not the entire
series.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists