lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:48:13 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	<olaf@...fle.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <apw@...onical.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<devel@...uxdriverproject.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<jasowang@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as
 special hypervisor interrupts

>>> On 24.01.13 at 02:17, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> @@ -69,6 +74,11 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>  	       ms_hyperv.features, ms_hyperv.hints);
>  
>  	clocksource_register_hz(&hyperv_cs, NSEC_PER_SEC/100);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Setup the IDT for hypervisor callback.
> +	 */
> +	alloc_intr_gate(HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR, hyperv_callback_vector);

Isn't doing this unconditionally here as problematic as the call to
clocksource_register_hz() turned out to be when Xen's Hyper-V
shim reacts to the CPUID inquiry above?

> @@ -77,3 +87,32 @@ const __refconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_ms_hyperv = {
>  	.init_platform		= ms_hyperv_init_platform,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_ms_hyperv);
> +
> +static int vmbus_irq = -1;
> +static irq_handler_t vmbus_isr;
> +
> +void hv_register_vmbus_handler(int irq, irq_handler_t handler)
> +{
> +	vmbus_irq = irq;
> +	vmbus_isr = handler;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_register_vmbus_handler);
> +
> +void hyperv_vector_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> +	irq_enter();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +	exit_idle();
> +#endif

This being in a file underneath arch/x86 - why the conditional?

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ