linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] regulator: Display in use regulators in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130124091134.GP15873@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:11:34 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] regulator: Display in use regulators in sysfs

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:19:27AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original
> > > design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownell's
> > > forceful insistance :/
> 
> > So I should pull the patch?
> 
> Not sure what you mean by pull; a stright revert won't work.

Sorry, perhaps I should have been clearer. 

Is the patch any good, or should I throw it in the bin (pull it)?

> > How do you feel about being able to access it via sysfs? Good or bad
> > idea? If it's a good idea, I can always change the name of the
> > variable?
> 
> That or debugfs.

So the premise of the patch is good and is worth updating and upstreaming?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/