[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51010C9302000078000B9045@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:27:31 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86-64: fix unwind annotations in recent NMI changes
While in one case a plain annotation is necessary, in the other case
the stack adjustment can simply be folded into the immediately
preceding RESTORE_ALL, thus getting the correct annotation for free.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 3.8-rc4/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ 3.8-rc4-x86_64-NMI-unwind/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1781,6 +1781,7 @@ first_nmi:
* Leave room for the "copied" frame
*/
subq $(5*8), %rsp
+ CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 5*8
/* Copy the stack frame to the Saved frame */
.rept 5
@@ -1863,10 +1864,8 @@ end_repeat_nmi:
nmi_swapgs:
SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
nmi_restore:
- RESTORE_ALL 8
-
- /* Pop the extra iret frame */
- addq $(5*8), %rsp
+ /* Pop the extra iret frame at once */
+ RESTORE_ALL 6*8
/* Clear the NMI executing stack variable */
movq $0, 5*8(%rsp)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists