[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B711E@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:45:50 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Romain Francoise" <romain@...bokech.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] vhost-net: fall back to vmalloc if high-order allocation fails
> + n = kmalloc(sizeof *n, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + if (!n)
> + n = vmalloc(sizeof *n);
I'm slightly confused by this construct.
I thought kmalloc(... GFP_KERNEL) would sleep waiting for
memory (rather than return NULL).
I realise that (for multi-page sizes) that kmalloc() and
vmalloc() both need to find a contiguous block of kernel
virtual addresses - in different address ranges, and
that vmalloc() then has to find physical memory pages
(which will not be contiguous).
I think this means that kmalloc() is likely to be faster
(if it doesn't have to sleep), but that vmalloc() is
allocating from a much larger resource.
This make me that that large allocations that are not
temporary should probably be allocated with vmalloc().
Is there a 'NO_SLEEP' flag to kmalloc()? is that all
GFP_ATOMIC requests? If so you might try a non-sleeping
kmalloc() with a vmalloc() if it fails.
This all looks as though there should be a GFP_NONCONTIG
flag (or similar) so that kmalloc() can make a decision itself.
Of at least a wrapper - like the one for free().
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists