[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358986694.12374.1267.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:18:14 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] kernel: faster queue spinlock implementation
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 15:13 -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> {
> - __q_spin_unlock(lock, node);
> - preempt_enable_no_resched();
> - local_bh_enable_ip((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
> + unsigned int cpu, i;
> + struct q_spinlock_token *token;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + token = kmalloc(sizeof(struct q_spinlock_alloc_token),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!token);
> + token->wait = false;
> + per_cpu(q_spinlock_token[i], cpu) = token;
> + }
You might use kmalloc_node(... , cpu_to_node(cpu)) to spread these
tokens on all nodes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists