linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] dw_dmac: return actual residue value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOh2x=mgqjR=Rtq=wVqM6Ut=LfdaskoMdo3K6qBbCSHV4qt0tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:20:23 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] dw_dmac: return actual residue value

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Since v2:
>  - get rid of dwc_update_residue(): for soft LLP mode we assign residue in
>    dwc_do_start() and decrease it at each interrupt.

I was talking about this comment or design we thought of. Where is this done.
I see residue being updated only from scan_descriptors().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/