linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special hypervisor interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04854149-91a3-4834-b2bb-de301c8241c9@email.android.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:11:32 -0600
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
CC:	x86@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, JBeulich@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special hypervisor interrupts

Sounds great in theory at least, as long as it doesn't mean pushing a bunch of #ifdefs into other code.

Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:56:09PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> index 1975122..803ca69 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>> @@ -1446,11 +1446,16 @@ ENTRY(xen_failsafe_callback)
>>  	CFI_ENDPROC
>>  END(xen_failsafe_callback)
>>  
>> -apicinterrupt XEN_HVM_EVTCHN_CALLBACK \
>> +apicinterrupt HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR \
>>  	xen_hvm_callback_vector xen_evtchn_do_upcall
>>  
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_XEN */
>>  
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> +apicinterrupt HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR \
>> +	hyperv_callback_vector hyperv_vector_handler
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
>
>arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `_set_gate':
>/w/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h:328: undefined
>reference to `hyperv_callback_vector'
>make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
>because, of course:
>
># CONFIG_HYPERV is not set
>
>But, I have a more serious pet-peeve with the whole hypervisors
>detection stuff: we're building arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
>unconditionally and yet, we have CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST to ask the user
>whether she wants to enable some options for running linux as a guest.
>
>And actually, it would be better to put all that virt-related stuff
>under a config option called HYPERVISOR or whatever, under "Processor
>type and features" which opens a menu with all virt stuff for people
>and
>distros to select.
>
>This way, init_hypervisor_platform and the rest of hypervisors stuff
>won't run needlessly on baremetal and setups who don't want that.
>
>Any non-starter reasons for not doing that?

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/