linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special hypervisor interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5101710F.9060409@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:36:15 -0600
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
	jasowang@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, JBeulich@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special
 hypervisor interrupts

On 01/24/2013 11:35 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:11:32AM -0600, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Sounds great in theory at least, as long as it doesn't mean pushing a
>> bunch of #ifdefs into other code.
> 
> Just one set in hypervisor.h but this is the RightWay™ we do it in the
> kernel :-).
> 
> Anyway, it turned out to be easier than I thought, just two patches
> which I'll be sending as a reply to this message. I'll run more
> randconfig tests on them, anyone sees issues please let me know.
> 

Awesome :)

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/