linux-kernel - Re: How should I proceed to get commit 891348c to 3.0.y?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130124181535.GB12106@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:15:35 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc:	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How should I proceed to get commit 891348c to 3.0.y?

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:28:51AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote:
> 
> I missed the email from 12/31 indicating commit 891348c was pulled from
> the 3.0.y stable tree due to a build breakage.
> 
> That commit requires the enum defined in traps.h by commit c940826.  That,
> in turn depends on commit 228bdaa95f which depends upon earlier commits.
> 
> How should I proceed?  Should I give you a patch that uses the constants
> in xpc_main.c? Should I add a patch which just pulls the enum portion of
> commit c940826 into traps.h? Any other direction you think this should go?

I think the last one makes the most sense as that makes it all
self-contained and sensible, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/