linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51018C55.6000709@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:32:37 -0800
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	"linux@...sktech.co.nz" <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	"josh.cartwright@...com" <josh.cartwright@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function

On 01/24/2013 11:20 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Prashant Gaikwad (2013-01-04 18:44:48)
>> On Friday 04 January 2013 10:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
>>>> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.
>>>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c |    3 ++-
>>>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c |    3 ++-
>>> Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is
>>> already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I
>>> think we'll end up with the following order being needed:
>>>
>>> 1) clk: Add composite clock type
>>>     -> This would usually go through the clk tree.
>>> 2) The Tegra CCF rework series
>>>     -> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies
>>>     and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches.
>>> 3) This series
>>>     -> This would usually go through the clk tree.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike
>>> can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as
>>> the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other
>>> Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)?
>>
>> If Mike approves the concept and implementation in (1) and (3) then I 
>> will repost (2) and (3) with dependencies re-ordered.
> 
> Patch (1) still has some unaddressed comments, and is not a real
> dependency for this series.

I assume "Patch (1)" refers to the list of series a couple emails above,
not the first patch in the series you're replying to; that threw me for
a moment.

> Since all of the patches have received their
> Tested-by's then I propose to merge all patches from this series into
> clk-next, which exception of patch 2/7 (the Tegra patch).
> 
> This reduces your Tegra CCF conversion dependencies and you can role the
> necessary of_clk_init change into your Tegra CCF conversion branch (it
> has my implicit Ack and can be taken through your tree).
> 
> Let me know if this is OK for you.

OK, I'm happy to merge your clock tree into the Tegra tree and then
apply 2/7 on top of the Tegra CCF work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/