[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5101FBE8.9000206@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:28:40 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm: IOMMU read-only mapping support
On 01/25/2013 09:17 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:03:57 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> A couple patches to make KVM IOMMU support honor read-only mappings.
>> This causes an un-map, re-map when the read-only flag changes and
>> makes use of it when setting IOMMU attributes. Thanks,
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> I think I can naturally update my patch after this gets merged.
>
Please wait.
The commit c972f3b1 changed the write-protect behaviour - it does
wirte-protection only when dirty flag is set.
[ I did not see this commit when we discussed the problem before. ]
Further more, i notice that write-protect is not enough, when do sync
shadow page:
FNAME(sync_page):
host_writable = sp->spt[i] & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i], pte_access,
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, gfn,
spte_to_pfn(sp->spt[i]), true, false,
host_writable);
It sets spte based on the old value that means the readonly flag check
is missed. We need to call kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all under this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists