[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130125064629.GD23723@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:16:29 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] uprobes: pre-filtering
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2013-01-24 18:06:12]:
> On 01/24, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately, currently there is no in-kernel user of
> > > pre-filtering.
> > >
> > > I'll try to implement the pid-base filtering at least for
> > > tracing/uprobe_events, but this needs a time. Not only I am
> > > not familiar with this code, I am not sure how this interface
> > > should actually look. And I agree, perf should be able to use
> > > it somehow, perhaps at least to allow to probe a single
> > > task/mm.
> >
> > Would be nice to get something minimal/simple going, so that it
> > can be tested, etc.
>
> Heh, I understand.
>
> I do not see anything simple to implement... I'll try to think.
> Srikar, do you have any idea?
>
> All I can say right now: I'll send you the patches when I have them ;)
> Can't promise this will be soon.
>
> _Perhaps_, as a first step, we can simply change create_trace_uprobe()
> so that it would be possible to specify list-of-pids at creation time...
> Not sure this actually makes sense.
>
[ Adding Masami and Steven since they have other ideas / inputs ]
I can see two not-so-easy alternatives
Reuse the event's post filtering meta data and convert it to a
prefiltering handler. Convertion looks very tricky
probe_event_enable() seems to be the right place to do this.
tu->call.filter would have the post filtering data
utc->filter needs to be set to the pre-filtering handler.
The other alternative is to extend the current abi and pass the
prefilter option. Should we extend the abi for userspace tracing is
obviously debatable.
> Oleg.
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists