[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <510242EF02000078000B96FD@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:31:43 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "KY Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as
special hypervisor interrupts
>>> On 24.01.13 at 20:10, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> I also have to point out the obvious problem with Xen masquerading as HyperV
> without implementing the same feature set...
I can't resist to state that this is what feature bits have been
introduced for in CPUID leaves. As long as Xen's shim doesn't
advertise a feature bit it doesn't implement, all should be fine.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists