[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130125082530.GE25314@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:25:30 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> >>> On 24.01.13 at 18:32, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> > On 01/24/2013 11:15 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> * Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> v2 of this series is merely updated on top of the changes between
> >>> 3.6 and 3.7-rc (which includes the dropping of what previously was
> >>> the second patch in a four patch series).
> >>>
> >>> 1: unify SSE-base xor-block routines
> >>> 2: add alternative SSE implementation only prefetching once per 64-byte line
> >>> 3: make virtualization friendly
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> >>
> >> Looks useful. Wondering what the status is: hpa, was your
> >> concern resolved, do you think we can apply these?
> >>
> >
> > I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch
> > 3/3 either in my inbox nor on LKML...
I think it's just that this is an older thread I found, possibly
out of your folder already.
They are looking good to me and I've applied them to x86/asm to
give it some testing as well. Please holler if you see something
funny.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists