[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSkeXEJkyFuBGYTUas=fqT+WSf5wknsfoymsE8JtaQcGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:52:59 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V5 1/6] perf, amd: Rework northbridge event
constraints handler
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com> wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
>
> Code simplification. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c | 68 +++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> index c93bc4e..e7963c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> @@ -256,9 +256,8 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
> - struct perf_event *old = NULL;
> - int max = x86_pmu.num_counters;
> - int i, j, k = -1;
> + struct perf_event *old;
> + int idx, new = -1;
>
> /*
> * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
> @@ -276,48 +275,33 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
> * because of successive calls to x86_schedule_events() from
> * hw_perf_group_sched_in() without hw_perf_enable()
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
> - /*
> - * keep track of first free slot
> - */
> - if (k == -1 && !nb->owners[i])
> - k = i;
> + for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) {
> + if (new == -1 || hwc->idx == idx)
> + /* assign free slot, prefer hwc->idx */
> + old = cmpxchg(nb->owners + idx, NULL, event);
> + else if (nb->owners[idx] == event)
> + /* event already present */
> + old = event;
> + else
> + continue;
> +
> + if (old && old != event)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* reassign to this slot */
> + if (new != -1)
> + cmpxchg(nb->owners + new, event, NULL);
> + new = idx;
>
> /* already present, reuse */
> - if (nb->owners[i] == event)
> - goto done;
> - }
> - /*
> - * not present, so grab a new slot
> - * starting either at:
> - */
> - if (hwc->idx != -1) {
> - /* previous assignment */
> - i = hwc->idx;
> - } else if (k != -1) {
> - /* start from free slot found */
> - i = k;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * event not found, no slot found in
> - * first pass, try again from the
> - * beginning
> - */
> - i = 0;
> - }
> - j = i;
> - do {
> - old = cmpxchg(nb->owners+i, NULL, event);
> - if (!old)
> + if (old == event)
> break;
> - if (++i == max)
> - i = 0;
> - } while (i != j);
> -done:
> - if (!old)
> - return &nb->event_constraints[i];
> -
> - return &emptyconstraint;
> + }
> +
> + if (new == -1)
> + return &emptyconstraint;
> +
> + return &nb->event_constraints[new];
> }
>
> static struct amd_nb *amd_alloc_nb(int cpu)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists