linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] lpc_ich: fix gpio base and control offsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbUU=TOeaHNwAw-=iTxtkQDNuS4KeVBFX4yirZa+fQ2uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:43:53 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Agócs Pál <agocs.pal.86@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lpc_ich: fix gpio base and control offsets

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:

> I backported this patch to 3.7.5 (which I'm still running now). That
> basically meant applying e294bc91760e11d2f1ebbac1d0a979069edf7adb ("mfd:
> lpc_ich: Fix resource request for [mem 0x00000000]") first and then
> manually adding some harmless context changes (ie, __devinit and
> __devexit stuff).
>
> Would testing on 3.7.5 be helpful?

Sure it's as good an indicator of the quality of the patch as any.

If it works on that kernel, it makes probablility lower that it breaks
your machine later on atleast.

Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/