[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxHJ+XKqHWAHVKmd6bHycr15mSdn6cLxh8wT=OHGD82uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:00:53 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ccross@...roid.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend 1/3] sched: fix nr_busy_cpus with coupled cpuidle
2013/1/25 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>:
> This sequence is not the right one
>
>> I'm going to look for the saved trace to check the sequence above
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce the bug that this patch was supposed to
> solved. The patch 2 and 3 seem enough to fix the nr_busy_cpus field. I will
> continue to try to reproduce it but it seems that it was a side effect of
> the 2 others fixes of the series
Ok. I just checked again as well and I can't find a scenario where
this can happen. If you find it out or trigger the bug again, don't
hesitate to resend this patch.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists