lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxHJ+XKqHWAHVKmd6bHycr15mSdn6cLxh8wT=OHGD82uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:00:53 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ccross@...roid.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend 1/3] sched: fix nr_busy_cpus with coupled cpuidle

2013/1/25 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>:
> This sequence is not the right one
>
>> I'm going to look for the saved trace to check the sequence above
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce the bug that this patch was supposed to
> solved. The patch 2 and 3 seem enough to fix the nr_busy_cpus field. I will
> continue to try to reproduce it but it seems that it was a side effect of
> the 2 others fixes of the series

Ok. I just checked again as well and I can't find a scenario where
this can happen. If you find it out or trigger the bug again, don't
hesitate to resend this patch.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ