linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci-sysfs: replace mutex_lock with mutex_trylock to avoid potential deadlock situation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:59:28 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lin Feng <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tangchen@...fujitsu.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-sysfs: replace mutex_lock with mutex_trylock to avoid
 potential deadlock situation

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:

> If we're going to fix the sysfs deadlock (and we should), I want to
> either see an argument for why we don't have a problem outside of
> sysfs, or I want to fix sysfs and non-sysfs at the same time.

Sure.

Jiang should have one patches to address that?

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/