linux-kernel - Re: Bug#695182: [PATCH] Subtract min_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1359118913.3146.3.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:01:53 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au, 695182@...s.debian.org
Cc:	minchan@...nel.org, psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Bug#695182: [PATCH] Subtract min_free_kbytes from dirtyable
 memory

On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 20:53 +1100, paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Minchan,
> 
> > So what's the effect for user?
> > ...
> > It seems you saw old kernel.
> > ...
> > Current kernel includes ...
> > So I think we don't need this patch.
> 
> As I understand now, my patch is "right" and needed for older kernels;
> for newer kernels, the issue has been fixed in equivalent ways; it was
> an oversight that the change was not backported; and any justification
> you need, you can get from those "later better" patches.
[...]

If you can identify where it was fixed then your patch for older
versions should go to stable with a reference to the upstream fix (see
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Q.  Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy?
A.  I don't know and I couldn't care less.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)