lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130126124716.GB21395@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:47:16 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	aquini@...hat.com, walken@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	lwoodman@...hat.com, knoel@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com,
	raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 5/5] x86,smp: limit spinlock delay on virtual machines

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +void __init init_spinlock_delay(void)
> > +{
> > +	if (x86_hyper)
> > +		max_spinlock_delay = MAX_SPINLOCK_DELAY_GUEST;
> 
> I realize that you took existing code and extended it, but that 
> chunk of code looks pretty disgusting visually now - at minimum 
> it should be vertically aligned as most other kernel code does.
> 
> The comment should also tell that the unit of these values is 
> 'spinlock-op loops' or so.

Also, with currently making PARAVIRT_GUEST optional, x86_hyper is maybe
a bad choice of a variable to test.

Maybe instead to this:

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST))
		...

Btw, this CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST will change into
CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ