[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c32f98cc-5996-4d8e-a5b7-1e2053840e88@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 07:13:57 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments
Yes.
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3
>either
>> >> in my inbox nor on LKML...
>> >
>> > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even
>> > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than
>> > e.g. from Ingo's, and all of this identical to 0...2).
>> >
>> > Or see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1688991/, according
>> > to which you even responded to it (which is the concern Ingo was
>> > referring to).
>> >
>>
>> Ah yes, now I have the context.
>>
>> And with that, I have to NAK the patch. I did talk to the KVM
>> people and they confirmed that this is NOT something they
>> want. They do not program VT-x to VMEXIT on CR0 changes.
>>
>> So this is Xen-specific, and penalizing other hypervisors is
>> wrong.
>
>Are patches #1 and #2 still OK?
>
>Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists