[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc2bf9ae-5e4b-47ba-bb3b-172cd6e124f4@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:04:40 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>, ling.ml@...pay.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/defconfig: Turn on CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE= y in the 64-bit defconfig
We have discussed -Ok(ernel) with the gcc guys in earnest. They are receptive but lack the round tuits.
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 11:43 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> The problem, of course, is that most -O2 code generation is done
>> assuming hot loops that don't show much if any I$ issues. And the -Os
>> thing is done *purely* for size, not taking any performance into
>> account at all. There's no balanced middle ground, which is what _we_
>> would want.
>
>Gcc needs to implement a -Olinus
>
>;-)
>
>-- Steve
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists