linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / scan: Additional changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1581701.fnbebHrKch@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:39:04 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI / scan: Additional changes

Hi All,

The following patches make two more changes to the ACPI namespace scanning
code that I think are more-or-less useful:

[1/2] Introduce lock to prevent acpi_bus_scan() from running in parallel with
      acpi_bus_trim() to avoid removing device nodes while we're setting
      them up.
[2/2] Change the scanning of fixed device nodes to work along the lines of
      acpi_bus_scan().

Patch [1/2] should apply on top of the acpi-scan branch, but [2/2] needs the
entire linux-pm.git/linux-next branch.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/