[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gmxye1j.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:14:48 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: serge.hallyn@...onical.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userns: Allow the unprivileged users to mount mqueue fs
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> On 2013/01/28 11:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>>
>>> This patch allow the unprivileged user to mount mqueuefs in
>>> user ns.
>>>
>>> If two userns share the same ipcns,the files in mqueue fs
>>> should be seen in both these two userns.
>>>
>>> If the userns has its own ipcns,it has its own mqueue fs too.
>>> ipcns has already done this job well.
>>
>> I am a little dense. When does userspace actually mount a mqueuefs?
>> My impression was that user space never needed to mount and actually
>> never could mount a mqueuefs. MS_NO_USER isn't set so mounting a
>> mqueuefs is possible but when does it happen and why?
>>
>
> Actually the files which representative messgae queue in mqueuefs contains
> some informations,such as QSIZE,NOTIFY,SIGNO,NOTIFY_PID.
>
> My workstation is Fedora 17,mqueuefs is mounted on /dev/mqueue by default.
> So I think at lest this patch is needed by some people.
I have just confirmed that the most you can do in a mounted mqueue fs is
to create files message queues.
Given that these filesystems exist anyway I don't see a problem.
Applied thanks.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists