[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOAMb1AsetjcNa_K6g=6K_s=0+tTH1aGLuX8emYrfgJOcx54cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:15:23 +0900
From: Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Chanho Min <chanho0207@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling
>Well, I thought I had explained that I'd prefer to see the poll rate
>adjusted with the baud rate, but maybe I wasn't explicit enough.
>Instead, what we seem to have ended up with are two new entries in
>platform data (which we're trying to get away from with DT):
>
>+ unsigned int dma_rx_poll_rate;
>+ unsigned int dma_rx_poll_timeout;
>
>If this were to be done, then receive DMA could be used on the Versatile
>PB platforms without having it suck CPU usage unnecessarily at slower
>baud rates.
This patch is working well on our pl011+ pl080 platform.
If no data is received during time-out, no tick timer works.
Do you want to adjust the poll rate with the baud rate additionally?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists