linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/26] mfd: ab8500-debugfs: Provide a means for a user subscribe to IRQs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130128082523.GY15873@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:25:23 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/26] mfd: ab8500-debugfs: Provide a means for a user
 subscribe to IRQs

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Samuel Ortiz wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:55:49PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Allow users to subscribe to and view IRQ events live from debugfs.
> I seem to remember that I got a similar patch some time ago for the same
> purpose and my answer was: Please use a UIO driver for this. There already is
> such driver, it's uio_pdrv_genirq. What your debugfs registration entry could
> do is adding a platform device for the specific interrupt number. This would
> avoid the irq handler registration and the sysfs entry creation, both things I
> believe are not very elegant and open coded. It also gives you an IRQ count
> implementation.
> Ideally, the UIO framework could be improved to support IRQ ranges (through
> IRQ domains) instead of the current single interrupt number.
> 
> Have you considered going through that path ?

I haven't looked into re-writing any of the MFD stuff yet. Instead I
have a plan of action:

1. Upstream as many of the 100 patches from the internal kernel up
into Mainline.

2. Mark any patches which are unsuitable for Mainlining and re-work
them after the remainder have been accepted. Not withstanding small
fixups, as these can be done on the fly without too much disruption.

3. Upstream the remainder once re-worked.

If I don't follow this work-flow and fix-up/re-work as I go, not only
will it take forever, but I'm also likely to encounter too many
complications in the way of conflicts in the latter stages.

I'm also following the same work-flow for 'drivers/power' and
'drivers/regulator'.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/