[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128000705.GA1306@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:07:05 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...ionio.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next/mmotm] swap: add per-partition lock for swapfile fix
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 01:47:01PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I had all cpus spinning in swap_info_get(), for the lock on an area
> being swapped off: probably because get_swap_page() forgot to unlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Good catch. Thanks!
> ---
>
> mm/swapfile.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- mmotm.orig/mm/swapfile.c 2013-01-23 17:55:39.132447115 -0800
> +++ mmotm/mm/swapfile.c 2013-01-27 10:41:45.000000000 -0800
> @@ -470,10 +470,9 @@ swp_entry_t get_swap_page(void)
> spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> /* This is called for allocating swap entry for cache */
> offset = scan_swap_map(si, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
> - if (offset) {
> - spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> + spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> + if (offset)
> return swp_entry(type, offset);
> - }
> spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> next = swap_list.next;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists