linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: Make numa benchmark optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130128100126.GA7168@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:01:26 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Make numa benchmark optional


* Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:

> Commit "perf: Add 'perf bench numa mem'..." added a NUMA performance
> benchmark to perf. Make this optional and test for required
> dependencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Makefile                 | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  tools/perf/builtin-bench.c          |  4 ++++
>  tools/perf/config/feature-tests.mak | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks!

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Arnaldo, can we merge tip:perf/bench into perf/core, or is there 
anything else to be done with that commit?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/