lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:47:01 +0100
From:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write

On 01/28/2013 02:26 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 08:16 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>> Now zram allocates new page with GFP_KERNEL in zram I/O path
>>>> if IO is partial. Unfortunately, It may cuase deadlock with
>>>
>>> s/cuase/cause/g
>>>
>>>> reclaim path so this patch solves the problem.
>>>
>>> It'd be nice to know about the problem in more detail. I'm also
>>> curious on why you decided on GFP_ATOMIC for the read path and
>>> GFP_NOIO in the write path.
>>
>> This is because we're holding a kmap_atomic page in the read path.
> 
> Okay, so that's about partial *reads* and not even mentioned in the
> changelog, no?
> 
> AFAICT, you could rearrange the code in zram_bvec_read() as follows:
> 
>         if (is_partial_io(bvec))
>                 /* Use  a temporary buffer to decompress the page */
>                 uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>         else {
>                 uncmem = user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
>         }
> 
> and avoid the GFP_ATOMIC allocation.
> 

user_mem still has to be mapped in case of partial I/O too. But the
temporary buffer allocation could happen before. The allocation still
would need to be GFP_NOIO to avoid possible deadlocks.

Anyhow, the commit message could definitely be more explicit.

Regards,
Jerome

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ