[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1301281011570.1997-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:12:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Shane Huang <shane.huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] sd: change to auto suspend mode
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > Someone just asked about the default autosuspend delay, and I realized
> > your patch series doesn't set one. Since we don't know the properties
> > of the disk drive at this point (or even whether the device is a disk
> > drive), the only safe course is to call
> >
> > pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&sdev->sdev_gendev, -1);
> >
> > before calling blk_pm_runtime_init(). Then autosuspends will be
> > prevented until userspace writes a non-negative value into the device's
> > control/autosuspend_delay_ms file.
>
> Shall we do it inside blk_pm_runtime_init? This way, we do not need to
> do it for every driver. And for drivers that do know a proper value for
> autosuspend delay, they can call pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay
> somewhere after blk_pm_runtime_init.
Yes, that seems like a good approach. Be sure to mention it in the
kerneldoc.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists