linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] dlm: use idr_for_each_entry() in recover_idr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:55:51 -0500
From:	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] dlm: use idr_for_each_entry() in
 recover_idr_clear() error path

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:31:07PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Convert recover_idr_clear() to use idr_for_each_entry() instead of
> idr_for_each().  It's somewhat less efficient this way but it
> shouldn't matter in an error path.  This is to help with deprecation
> of idr_remove_all().
> 
> Only compile tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
> Cc: cluster-devel@...hat.com
> ---
> This patch depends on an earlier idr patch and I think it would be
> best to route these together through -mm.  Christine, David, can you
> please ack this?

Ack

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/