Message-Id: <664484EB-E780-4A0C-9932-37E843F76EB7@lukyanov.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:38:36 +0400
From:	Igor Lukyanov <igor@...yanov.org>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: multiple heavy-loaded kvm guests cause NULL pointer in scheduler (kernel v 3.7.4)

Hello,
we faced a repeatable scheduler or kvm bug while running multiple heavy-loaded kvm-virtualized winsrv 2008 guests on 3.7.4 kernel based Debian.
Few minutes after 10-15 virtual machines being started for their first time, the host falls into panic with one of the next traces:

TRACE 1:
[  589.970970] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
...
[  592.818372] Call Trace:
[  592.847727]  [<ffffffff81066544>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0x45/0x11e
[  592.921781]  [<ffffffff8105fdfc>] ? pick_next_task+0x1e/0x3f
[  592.989592]  [<ffffffff8136fdad>] ? __schedule+0x251/0x4e8
[  593.055320]  [<ffffffffa069dc8a>] ? trace_kvm_mmio+0x4d/0x4d [kvm]
[  593.129366]  [<ffffffffa06b2692>] ? segmented_read.isra.30+0x83/0xba [kvm]
[  593.211745]  [<ffffffff8107a504>] ? futex_wait_queue_me+0xbb/0xd6
[  593.284734]  [<ffffffff8107b04c>] ? futex_wait+0x10c/0x238
[  593.350484]  [<ffffffff8104cc29>] ? __set_current_blocked+0x2d/0x43
[  593.425555]  [<ffffffff8104cc9b>] ? sigprocmask+0x5c/0x63
[  593.490259]  [<ffffffffa06a588b>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xc48/0xc9f [kvm]
[  593.575739]  [<ffffffff8107c341>] ? do_futex+0xb3/0x81c
[  593.638350]  [<ffffffffa06a417d>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x1b/0x24 [kvm]
[  593.715520]  [<ffffffffa0693127>] ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x427/0x45e [kvm]
[  593.791657]  [<ffffffff8100d829>] ? __switch_to+0x38b/0x3cf
[  593.858415]  [<ffffffff8107cbc5>] ? sys_futex+0x11b/0x14e
[  593.923113]  [<ffffffffa069cdea>] ? kvm_on_user_return+0x36/0x5c [kvm]
[  594.001318]  [<ffffffff8100e62b>] ? do_notify_resume+0x5d/0x65
[  594.071225]  [<ffffffff8109ff3f>] ? rcu_user_enter+0x51/0x89
[  594.139025]  [<ffffffff81375ca9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[  594.213065] Code: 48 09 c2 48 89 11 49 8b 48 08 48 85 c9 74 0c 48 8b 11 83 e2 01 48 09 c2 48 89 11 b9 06 00 00 00 48 89 c7 4c 89 c6 f3 a5 c3 31 c0 <48> 3b 3f 74 30 48 8b 47 08 48 85 c0 75 1e eb 03 48 89 d7 48 8b 
[  594.452471] RIP  [<ffffffff811c1fc1>] rb_next+0x2/0x38
[  594.514252]  RSP <ffff881019ee7b90>
[  594.556063] CR2: 0000000000000010
[  594.595803] ---[ end trace 8356dcba509c850e ]---

(see full trace in http://xdel.ru/downloads/oops-default-kvmintel.txt)

TRACE 2:
[52724.761591] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
[52724.770555] Call Trace:
[52724.770626]  [<ffffffff81065709>] ? set_next_entity+0x32/0x52
[52724.770702]  [<ffffffff810665b4>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0xb5/0x11e
[52724.770779]  [<ffffffff8105fdfc>] ? pick_next_task+0x1e/0x3f
…
[52724.770702] RIP  [<ffffffff811c1d57>] rb_erase+0x1de/0x28f

(full trace: http://imgur.com/QUmszYj http://imgur.com/zhqLrCy http://imgur.com/TZipg7F)

In both cases system goes into active context switching (20-30% SYS CPU load) before the crash.

Some words about environment:
1. Traces produced on 3.7.4 kernel, though the same test is fatal for other kernel versions (checked on 3.4 and 3.2, with different traces).
2. CPU control groups are enabled and used for constraining guests' CPU consumption.
3. Bug is stably repeated with and without hyper threading, on 2-head Supermicro server having 2 numa nodes with following cpu layout: '0-5,12-17' and '6-11,18-23'. We haven't been able to produce the bug on a server with single numa node (maybe it's the key to solution).

Thank you for help.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists