[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1301271932070.896@eggly.anvils>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:35:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/11] ksm: get_ksm_page locked
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:08 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Simon Jeons wrote:
> > >
> > > Why the parameter lock passed from stable_tree_search/insert is true,
> > > but remove_rmap_item_from_tree is false?
> >
> > The other way round? remove_rmap_item_from_tree needs the page locked,
> > because it's about to modify the list: that's secured (e.g. against
> > concurrent KSM page reclaim) by the page lock.
>
> How can KSM page reclaim path call remove_rmap_item_from_tree? I have
> already track every callsites but can't find it.
It doesn't. Please read what I said above again.
> BTW, I'm curious about
> KSM page reclaim, it seems that there're no special handle in vmscan.c
> for KSM page reclaim, is it will be reclaimed similiar with normal
> page?
Look for PageKsm in mm/rmap.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists