[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5106B03E.6070302@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:07:10 -0600
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: zsmalloc: various cleanups/improvments
On 01/27/2013 09:47 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> These patches are the first 4 patches of the zswap patchset I
>> sent out previously. Some recent commits to zsmalloc and
>> zcache in staging-next forced a rebase. While I was at it, Nitin
>> (zsmalloc maintainer) requested I break these 4 patches out from
>> the zswap patchset, since they stand on their own.
>
> [2/4] and [4/4] is okay to merge current zsmalloc in staging but
> [1/4] and [3/4] is dependent on zswap so it should be part of
> zswap patchset.
Just to clarify, patches 1 and 3 are _not_ dependent on zswap. They
just introduce changes that are only needed by zswap.
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists