linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:15:28 -0800
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	tj@...nel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:11:39PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > +int percpu_ref_kill(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> > > +{
> > > ...
> > > +	if (status == PCPU_REF_PTR) {
> > > +		unsigned count = 0, cpu;
> > > +
> > > +		synchronize_rcu();
> > > +
> > > +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > > +			count += *per_cpu_ptr((unsigned __percpu *) pcpu_count, cpu);
> > > +
> > > +		pr_debug("global %lli pcpu %i",
> > > +			 atomic64_read(&ref->count) & PCPU_COUNT_MASK,
> > > +			 (int) count);
> > > +
> > > +		atomic64_add((int) count, &ref->count);
> > > +		smp_wmb();
> > > +		/* Between setting global count and setting PCPU_REF_DEAD */
> > > +		ref->pcpu_count = PCPU_REF_DEAD;
> >
> > The coment explains what the code does, but not why ;)
> >
> > I guess this is for percpu_ref_put(), and this wmb() pairs with implicit
> > mb() implied by atomic64_dec_return().
> 
> Hmm. Most probably I missed something, but it seems we need another
> synchronize_rcu() _after_ we set PCPU_REF_DEAD.

Yeah, correct - documentation bug.

I originally had the synchronize_rcu() there, but this is called by
exit_aio() -> kill_ioctx() when we're killing a process, and Ben LaHaise
pointed out that was less than ideal if a process had a bunch of ioctxs
- so I left the second one out there so the caller would have the option
of using call_rcu() instead.

> To simplify, suppose that percpu_ref_put() is never called directly but
> we have
> 
> 	void put_and_dsetroy(...)
> 	{
> 		if (percpu_ref_put(...))
> 			destroy(...);
> 	}
> 
> Suppose that ref->count == 2 after atomic64_add() above. IOW, we have
> a "master" reference for _kill() and someone else did _get.
> 
> So the caller does
> 
> 	percpu_ref_kill();
> 	put_and_dsetroy();
> 
> And this can race with another holder which drops the last reference,
> its put_and_dsetroy() can see PCPU_REF_DYING and return false.
> 
> Or I misunderstood the code/interface?

Nope, nailed it :) That should _definitely_ be in the documentation.

Actually - I think it'd be better to have the default percpu_ref_kill()
do the second synchronize_rcu(), and have an unsafe version that skips
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/