| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130128182501.GA18317@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:25:01 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: Kill set_trace_uprobe_filter_func()
Now that uprobe_consumer is embedded into "struct trace_uprobe" we
can remove the ugly set_trace_uprobe_filter_func() and initialize
consumer->handler/filter at create_ time.
The patch looks complicated, but this is only because it moves
trace_uprobe_filter_func() up before init_trace_uprobe_filter().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 6551b77..642e003 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -63,50 +63,6 @@ static void unregister_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(uprobe_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(uprobe_list);
-static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs);
-
-static int init_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter,
- const char *arg)
-{
- struct task_struct *p;
- pid_t tgid;
-
- if (!arg)
- return 0;
-
- if (kstrtouint(arg, 0, &tgid))
- goto err;
-
- filter->tgid = find_get_pid(tgid);
- if (!filter->tgid)
- goto err;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- p = pid_task(filter->tgid, PIDTYPE_PID);
- if (!p || !has_group_leader_pid(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
- p = NULL;
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- if (p)
- return 0;
-err:
- pr_info("Failed to find the process by pid=%s\n", arg);
- /* free_trace_uprobe() will take care of ->tgid != NULL */
- return -ESRCH;
-}
-
-static void free_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
-{
- put_pid(filter->tgid);
-}
-
-static void probes_seq_show_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter,
- struct seq_file *m)
-{
- if (filter->tgid)
- seq_printf(m, " pid=%d", pid_vnr(filter->tgid));
-}
-
static bool trace_uprobe_filter_current(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
{
return !filter->tgid || filter->tgid == task_tgid(current);
@@ -144,13 +100,52 @@ static bool trace_uprobe_filter_func(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
return ret;
}
-static inline void set_trace_uprobe_filter_func(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
- struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
+static int init_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe *tu, const char *arg)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+ pid_t tgid;
+
+ if (!arg)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (kstrtouint(arg, 0, &tgid))
+ goto err;
+
+ tu->filter.tgid = find_get_pid(tgid);
+ if (!tu->filter.tgid)
+ goto err;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ p = pid_task(tu->filter.tgid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ if (!p || !has_group_leader_pid(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ p = NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (!p)
+ goto err;
+
+ tu->consumer.filter = trace_uprobe_filter_func;
+ return 0;
+err:
+ pr_info("Failed to find the process by pid=%s\n", arg);
+ /* free_trace_uprobe() will take care of ->tgid != NULL */
+ return -ESRCH;
+}
+
+static void free_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
+{
+ put_pid(tu->filter.tgid);
+}
+
+static void probes_seq_show_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter,
+ struct seq_file *m)
{
if (filter->tgid)
- uc->filter = trace_uprobe_filter_func;
+ seq_printf(m, " pid=%d", pid_vnr(filter->tgid));
}
+static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs);
+
/*
* Allocate new trace_uprobe and initialize it (including uprobes).
*/
@@ -179,6 +174,7 @@ alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs)
goto error;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tu->list);
+ tu->consumer.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
return tu;
error:
@@ -196,7 +192,7 @@ static void free_trace_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
traceprobe_free_probe_arg(&tu->args[i]);
iput(tu->inode);
- free_trace_uprobe_filter(&tu->filter);
+ free_trace_uprobe_filter(tu);
kfree(tu->call.class->system);
kfree(tu->call.name);
kfree(tu->filename);
@@ -397,7 +393,7 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
goto error;
}
- ret = init_trace_uprobe_filter(&tu->filter, filter_arg);
+ ret = init_trace_uprobe_filter(tu, filter_arg);
if (ret)
goto error;
@@ -644,10 +640,7 @@ static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
if (tu->enabled)
return -EINTR;
- set_trace_uprobe_filter_func(&tu->consumer, &tu->filter);
- tu->consumer.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
tu->flags |= flag;
-
ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
if (ret)
tu->flags &= ~flag;
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists