linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130128183246.GB26407@google.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:32:46 -0800
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, zab@...hat.com, bcrl@...ck.org,
	jmoyer@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	tytso@....edu, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/32] Generic dynamic per cpu refcounting

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:59:51AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Kent.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:53:04AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > Like Tejun, I'd prefer to see it always alloc up-front, because it
> > > avoids the _noalloc variant (which is backwards: please hand gfp_t, so
> > > you don't hide the alloc) and heuristics.
> > 
> > Problem with gfp_t is alloc_percpu() doesn't take it. I don't know why,
> > but this all goes away with Tejun's idea for allocating from a pool
> > refilled by workqueue.
> 
> It goes down to how we allocate page tables.  percpu depends on
> vmalloc space allocation which in turn depends on page table
> allocation which unfortunately assumes GFP_KERNEL and is spread all
> across different architectures.  Adding @gfp to it came up a couple
> times but the cases weren't strong enough to push it all the way
> through.  There are some aspects that I like about forcing GFP_KERNEL
> on all percpu allocations but if there are strong enough cases and
> someone is willing enough to push it through, maybe.

Ahh, thanks for explaining, was curious about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/