[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128194949.GJ22465@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:49:49 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:51:37PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2012/12/22 10:57), Tejun Heo wrote:
> > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() seems largely broken. It uses
> > optimizer_comp which is never re-initialized, so
> > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() will never wait for anything once
> > kprobe_optimizer() finishes all pending jobs for the first time.
>
> Thank you for fixing that!
> I must misunderstand that the DECLARE_COMPLETION() macro.
>
> > Also, aside from completion, delayed_work_pending() is %false once
> > kprobe_optimizer() starts execution and wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()
> > won't wait for it.
> >
> > Reimplement it so that it flushes optimizing_work until
> > [un]optimizing_lists are empty. Note that this also makes
> > optimizing_work execute immediately if someone's waiting for it, which
> > is the nicer behavior.
>
> I think your enhancement is reasonable and GOOD for me.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Can I take it through workqueue branch w/ other patches?
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists